'Criticism of misjudgment → splitting of corporate and civic clubs'... press conference on 'judgment' that went to the mountains
'Criticism of misjudgment → splitting of corporate and civic clubs'... press conference on 'judgment' that went to the mountains
Blog Article
The start was good, but the flow got weird as time went by.
Choi Dae-ho, owner of FC Anyang, held an emergency press conference on the referee's decision at Anyang Sports Complex at 2 p.m. on the 20th. The Anyang club said on the 19th, "We will hold an emergency press conference at the media room of Anyang Sports Complex at 2 p.m. on the 20th to convey the official position of the owner Choi Dae-ho regarding the referee's decision that occurred in the Anyang game."
The meeting was held to convey the opinions of Choi Dae-ho, the owner of the team, on the questionable decisions that have been made to Anyang this season. Choi Dae-ho, the owner of the team, appealed for unfairness by selecting 10 controversial decisions in a total of five matches: the sixth round match against Jeonbuk Hyundai, the Korea Cup round of 16, Daegu FC, the eighth round against Pohang Steelers, the 12th round against FC Seoul, and the 14th round against Jeonbuk. "This is not a matter of Anyang, but a matter that all of us share. That is why I think we need to make efforts and arrangements to enhance the quality and quality of the judging committee," he said.
It was enough to win the sympathy of not only Anyang fans but also K-League fans in general. This is because many clubs suffered from obvious misjudgment this season alone. Choi Dae-ho, the owner of the team, said, "Professional players have to prove it with the results, but when such results come out, we need to see if it was a fair game. I thought it was necessary for the development of Korean soccer as well."
As the press conference progressed, however, the situation became more strange. "Corporate teams and civic teams are different from other clubs even in their resources," Choi said, comparing them directly to civic teams. Though he did not get to see all the clubs, his story is that of some clubs. Compared to our clubs, players' salaries are almost three times higher. We have all the good players. We are literally dedicating ourselves and sacrificing ourselves under the difficult circumstances of our players. From this point of view, the reality is that it is not the case, but I think the rules need to be applied fairly."
"I haven't watched all the videos of baseball clubs. However, I will speak for some civic clubs. To put it bluntly, there is clearly a problem," he said, explaining the irrationality he is receiving as a civic club.
From here, K-League fans' heads became tilted. There was a lack of evidence that the judgment was more favorable to corporate teams than civic teams. Among the games brought by owner Choi Dae-ho as an example of the misjudgment, the game of Daegu, the same civic club, was also included.
What made the remarks that failed to win sympathy from fans of the K-League was "dedication and sacrifice." "We are truly committed and sacrificed under the difficult circumstances of the players," said Choi Dae-ho, the owner of the team. However, the question of who the players are dedicating and sacrificing at the club run by taxpayers' money has not been erased. The remarks also tarnished the meaning of criticism of the decision. 스포츠토토
In fact, the public's view of the professional soccer team of the city and provincial residents is not good enough. For professional soccer that only some cities and provincial residents enjoy, taxpayers' money for those who don't are also used. Those who are not interested in professional soccer raise their voices, saying, "We should rather use taxpayers' money used for the city and provincial clubs for the public good." It was a press conference held to criticize the "judgment," but as a result, it was a place that failed to win sympathy from everyone.